Sappho

Dogs are not an alibi for other themes; dogs are fleshly material-semiotic presences in the body of technoscience. Dogs are not surrogates for theory; they are not here just to think with. They are here to live with.

从生态人类学（？）的视角先给狗找准位置。

Prehension：

Beings do not preexist their relatings. “Prehensions” have consequences...Biological and cultrural determinism are both instances of misplaced concreteness-i.e., the mistake of, first, taking provisional and local category abstractions like “nature”and “culture” for the world and, second, mistaking potent consequences to be preexisting foundations.

提供一种超越的视角。接下来就是这样分析：

My love of Whitehead is rooted in biology, but even more in the practice of feminist theory as I have experienced it.

不过这里提到女性主义说的是非二元等等，感觉其实也可以从ingold那条路走，非二元也可以是生态的、栖居的视角，反正都是分析工具……感觉这里还停留在后现代女权，当然在这里不能多写，否则又要大发牢骚。