【摘录】【翻译】对话拉康 Conversations with Lacan

Fri, 30 Sep 2022 03:04:49 +0000

最近刚读完的一本书，全名是“Conversations with Lacan: Seven Lectures for Understanding Lacan”。拉康相关的书已经读了十几本，这是唯一一本让我在学习之余还想大呼过瘾的。可能因为作者母语是意大利语的关系，他在句法和措辞上和英语母语的作者有着很明显的不同。而正是这种异质性，让我难以忽略那些古怪新奇的词汇和句式——不得不停下来查询词典或者反复品味，这在我读Fink时是完全不曾有过的。当然，比起写作手法，这本书最具魅力的莫过于其中

的思想了。

以下原文摘编自第一章和最后一章：

Between 1967 and 1974 I followed the seminar of Jacques Lacan. I met Lacan several times in public situations, but I never considered going into analysis with him, for reasons I shall explain later.

The reader could rightly ask: “so, Benvenuto, are you or aren't you a Lacanian?”

In my youth I was a fervent Lacan fan. Then, after overcoming my transference with him, I stopped being one, and for me he was no longer the subject supposed to know. As we said, for Lacan transference occurs because the analyst is considered a subject supposed to know. But my “analysis” with Lacan ended long ago. Which is not to say that someone who has ended an analysis has necessarily been cured.

I'm not a Lacanian, but let's say that I love Lacan. Lacan himself said that we should love our symptom, and, indeed, I love Lacan as my symptom. But, as one does with a symptom, I keep at a necessary distance from him, with a sort of pain. Lacan is my joy and my pain. Lacan said, “Do as I do: don't imitate me.” In this case Lacan isn't very surprising; several masters in various fields have said very similar things. Apparently Marx said he wasn't a Marxist while Jung said “thank God, I'm Jung, and not a Jungian!” And so on, and so on. The master's refusal to be a “-ian” or an “-ist” of himself has become a sort of stereotype. And part of the very structure of “being a master” is a certain self-consoling contempt towards one's pupils, even the most loved ones. In any case, it's true that I am not a Lacanian precisely because I prefer to do as Lacan did: i.e. I also try to separate from my masters, including Lacan. I am a practical Lacanist, not a theoretical one.

—Conversations with Lacan (2020), Sergio Benvenuto

简单的翻译：

在1967年到1974年间，我曾参加过雅克拉康的研讨班。我曾多次在公共场合遇见过拉康，但从来没有考虑过找他做分析，至于原因我在后面会说到。

有读者可能会问我“那你到底是不是个拉康派呢，本韦努托？” 在我年轻的时候我曾是拉康的死忠粉，但随着我逐渐跨越了对他的这份移情，我也不再是以往那样了，对我来说他已经不再是那个知晓答案的主体了。正如我们所讨论过的，拉康式移情的产生源自分析师被当成了一个知晓答案的主体，而我与拉康之间的“分析”早已结束太久。不过，并不是说分析的结束就必然意味着痊愈。

我不是一个拉康派，但可以说我爱拉康。拉康亲口说过我们应该爱我们的症状，以及，诚然，我爱拉康作为我的症状。然而，作为人的一种症状，我必须与他保持好距离，并为此而痛苦。拉康既是我的享乐也是我的痛苦。拉康说过“做我所做的事，但不要模仿我。”，他说出这样的话并不出乎意料——其他领域的诸多大师也说过类似的话。显然马克思说过他不是马克思主义者，同样荣格也说过“谢天谢地我是荣格，而不是什么荣格派！”

这些大师都拒绝成为“xx派”或“xx主义者”这类带有偏见性的自己的名号。然而，追随者们轻浮的自我安慰这正是“作为大师”这个结构的一环，即便对于那些最受爱戴的人也是如此。反正毋庸置疑我并非拉康派，确切来说是我更愿意行拉康之事——即我愿意和我的导师们分离，包括拉康。因为我是一名拉康主义的践行者，而非理论派。

——对话拉康 (2020), 塞尔吉奥·本韦努托

精神病理与防卫机制

Table From ”Conversations with Lacan“, P. 127

Psychopathology	Type of Negation
NEUROSIS – Phobia – Hysteria (Borderline Personality) – Obsessional	REPRESSION (Verdrängung, Displacement)
PERVERSIONS – Fetishism–Masochism – Sadism, Sadomasochism – Voyeurism–Exhibitionism, Zoophilia, frotteurism, pedophilia, coprophilia	DISAVOWAL (Verleugnung)
PSYCHOSIS – PARANOIAS – Persecution Delusion – Megalomaniac Delusion – Erotomania – Jealousy Delusion (querulous paranoia) – SCHIZOPHRENIAS – MELANCHOLIA (MANIC-DEPRESSIVE)	FORECLOSURE (Verwerfung) seizure of the Name-of-the-Father

翻译参考自《拉康精神分析介绍性辞典》、维基百科

精神病理/机能障碍	防御方式/防卫机制
神经症 – 恐怖/恐惧症 – 癔症/歇斯底里 (边缘型人格/BPD) – 强迫症	压抑/移置
性倒错/变态 – 恋物癖–受虐狂 – 施虐狂、施虐受虐狂 – 窥阴癖/窥视症–露阴癖/暴露狂 – 恋兽癖、摩擦癖、恋童癖、嗜粪癖	否认
精神病 – 偏执狂 – 迫害妄想 – 自大狂妄想 (自恋型人格/NPD) – 恋爱/被爱妄想 – 嫉妒妄想 (抱怨偏执) – 精神分裂症 – 忧郁/躁郁症 (双相情感障碍/BD)	排除/拒斥对父之名的弃绝

#摘录 #翻译 #对话拉康 #拉康 #精神分析 #读书

对话拉康 — 安娜提戈涅

【摘录】【翻译】对话拉康 Conversations with Lacan